(2021). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND LANDSCAPE FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDUSE IN WADI TARFA, MINYA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT. The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change, 13(1), 51-66. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2021.149018
. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND LANDSCAPE FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDUSE IN WADI TARFA, MINYA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT". The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change, 13, 1, 2021, 51-66. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2021.149018
(2021). 'THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND LANDSCAPE FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDUSE IN WADI TARFA, MINYA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT', The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change, 13(1), pp. 51-66. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2021.149018
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND LANDSCAPE FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDUSE IN WADI TARFA, MINYA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT. The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change, 2021; 13(1): 51-66. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2021.149018
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND LANDSCAPE FOR SUSTAINABLE LANDUSE IN WADI TARFA, MINYA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT
Egypt has limited cultivable land, its water resources are limited and its population is growing, which in turn is destroying the cultivable land. This issue can be solving by use of desert land. This study aims to identify the resources provided by the Egyptian deserts, their potential and how they can be utilized in sustainable development by study characteristics of Egyptian soil and how their composition changes over time. In this respect, the eastern desert is one of the promising areas in Egypt. Wadi El-Tarfa is one of semi-arid areas located in eastern Desert of Egypt composed of Cretaceous and Eocene limestone and Quaternary sediments. Samples were collected from 10 profile, about 25 representative soil samples from different depth were collected. Each sample was prepared by air-dried, crushed, sieved through a 2 mm sieve and chemical, physical properties and soil nutrient element level were analyzed. The data obtained from the soil survey indicates that, soils are generally sandy, moderately -alkaline, non-saline to slightly saline, and the percentage of organic matter less than 0.5%. The profile depth are varied from very shallow (less than 30 cm) to moderately deep (ranging from 50 -100 cm) and deep (100-150 cm) with high amounts of gravels on the profiles surface. Obtained data indicated that, there are significant differences between profiles depths in gravels, EC, CaCo3, Gypsum, particle size distribution fraction and contents of NPK, while no significant differences between profiles depths in pH and OM. On the other hand, there are a high positive correlation between N contents and O.M% and negative correlation with both of pH and CaCo3 %. Data also showed a cleared negative correlation between P content and both of pH and gypsum and high negative correlation between K content and gypsum followed by CaCo3 and positive correlation with both of pH and O.M. Morphologically described, classified according to soil taxonomy (USDA, 2014) and 24 soil samples were collected for lab analyses. Two soil orders are identified in the study area i.e.Aridisols, which are dominated in the study area, and Entisols. These orders are differentiated into suborders, great groups, and subgroups. The main soil sub-orders detected in the study area are Gypsids, Calcids. The current suitability of the studied soil profiles was estimated by matching between the present land characteristics and their ratings outlined by FAO (1976). Suitability indices and classification of the studied soils revealed that there are three suitability classes, i.e., moderately suitable, marginally suitable and actually unsuitable. The most limiting factors in the studied soils are topography of the terrain, profile depth, gravel, CaCO3, salinity index (EC), Exchangeable sodium ratio (ESP), slope and gypsum content with differentiated to five classes according to their expected hazards very low, low, moderate, severe and very severe intensity. This current suitability can be more profitable after executing the main growth limitations as agricultural mechanization to improve soil characteristics from depth and slope, in addition to using modern irrigation methods such as drip or sprinkler and using of good fertilizer program.
Abaslon,M, and Abtahi,A.(2008). Potassium quantity – intensity parameters and its carrelation with selected soil properties imn some soils of Iran. Journal of Applied sciences 8(10): 1875-1882.
Ahmed A.A. and. Shabana A. R. (2020). Integrating of remote sensing, GIS and geophysical data for recharge potentiality evaluation in Wadi El Tarfa, eastern desert, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences 172: 1-15.
Aggour T.A., and Sadek M.A., (2001). The recharge mechanism of some cases of the different groundwater aquifers, eastern Desert, Egypt. Bull Fac Sci Mansoura University 28(1):43–78.
Attia A. A. H, El Alfy Z. S. and Dowidar H. M., (2002). Utilization of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System in the Sustainable Development of the Central Eastern Desert Area of Egypt. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Science, Geology Department, 179 p.
Black, C. A. (1983). Methods of soil analysis, part I and II SoilSci.An.Inc. Public. Madison , Wise., USA.
Bishay, Y., (1961). Biostratigraphic Study of the Eocene in the Eastern Desert between Samalut and Assiut by the Large Foraminifera.
Boukhary, Abdulla, A.Y., (1985). Stratigraphy and Petrology of the Eocene Rocks at Maghagha (East and West), Nile Valley, Egypt.
Darwish, Kh. M. and M. M. Wahba (2010). Geo-Pedological features of some dry valleys in the Eastern Desert, Egypt. J GIS Trends (1):8-14.
De Smet J., J. Vanderdeelen and G. Hofman (2008). Effect of soil properties on the kinetics of phosphate release. Journal Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 11: 2135-2147.
El Belasy I.M. (1994). Quaternary geology of some selected drainage basins in Upper Egypt (Qena- Edfu area). PhD, Cairo University, Egypt.
FAO (1976).A Framework For Land Evaluation, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS.
FAO, (2006). Guidelines for soil description. Fourth edition, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS.
Gihan M. Ebied (2010). Relationship between landform and soil characteristics and productivity on the north coast of Africa. Ph.D. Institute of African Studies (Natural Resources), Cairo, Univ.
Jackson, M.L., (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Advancedcoarse Ed.2. A Manual of methods useful for instruction and research in soil chemistry, physical chemistry of soil, soil fertility and soil genesis. Revised from Original Edition (1955).
Kenneth M., Brenna J. A, Nicholas E. C., Michelle L. M., Eugene M. M., and S. Richard (2019). Relationship between soil properties and Nitrogen mineralization in undisturbed soil cores from California agroecosystems. Journal Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50: 77-92.
Klingebiel, A.A. and P.H. Montgomery (1969). Land capability classification Agric. Handb. 210. Washington DC: Department of Agriculture KUCHIER, A.W.1967 Vegetation mapping New York: Ronald
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeny, D. R. (1982). Methods of soil analysis, Part 2- Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
Said R, (1993). The River Nile Geology and Hydrology and utilization, Oxford. Britain Pergmon press. 320 p. Smith, G. (1986): The Guy. Smith interviews; Rational for concepts in soil taxonomy. USDA- SMSS.,Tech. Monograph No., 11, Washington, D.C., USA.
Said, R., (2017). The Geology of Egypt. Routledge.
Soltanpour, P. N. (1985). Use of ammonium bicarbonateDTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity. Common. Soil Sci., Plant Anal., Vol. 163:323-338.
U.S.D.A. (1962). Land capability classification, Soil conservation service.
U.S.D.A. (2006). Key of soil taxonomy, soil survey staff
U.S.D.A. (2014). Key of soil taxonomy twelfth education, United State Dep. of Agric., USA.
View on SCiNiTO
Top